-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 757
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only use serial crsf battery sensor if detected #1968
Merged
pkendall64
merged 6 commits into
master
from
only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-detected
Mar 2, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
53bef3f
only use serial crsf battery sensor if detected
JyeSmith d8104b9
Merge branch 'master' into only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-det…
JyeSmith be393f0
Merge branch 'master' into only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-det…
JyeSmith 7d64dce
Merge branch 'master' into only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-det…
JyeSmith 9d4b57e
Merge branch 'master' into only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-det…
JyeSmith 089d131
Merge branch 'master' into only-use-serial-crsf-battery-sensor-if-det…
JyeSmith File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could be wrong, but its probably not the best practice to assume this bool will initialise to false...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
C++ guarantees that variables are created with a specific initial value. And for booleans that is the
false
value 😄There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats not what 5mins on stackoverflow taught me, but fair enough. I was always told that member vars should always be initialised (i.e. in the class constructor etc.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4622225/arent-boolean-variables-always-false-by-default
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Im happy to change it just for the readability. But there are multiple instances that should be updated and probably not as part of this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, you are right Wez, only globals are automatically set to defaults.