-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clustering is needed for creating a device service group cluster of multiple BigIPs #400
Comments
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 11, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 17, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 18, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
This was referenced May 19, 2016
Closed
Closed
Issue Review: This looks like progressing. The mentioned issues could be folded into this one |
Please see #208 for some relevant information. |
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 24, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 24, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
to pjbreaux/f5-common-python-1
that referenced
this issue
May 24, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Clustering is needed for creating a device service group cluster of multiple bigip devices Analysis: This is part of a refactor from a code review that happened offline. It was suggested to refactor the external interface that previously existed with the Cluster class into ClusterManager, TrustDomain, and DeviceGroup classes, which maintain state for their respective operations and data. The interfaces presented by each of the classes above are as uniform as possible, and allow for the ClusterManager to manage the DeviceGroup and TrustDomain with ease. Tests: All previous unit tests and functional tests have been refactored or rewritten in some way. All tests are currently passing.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2016
Issues: Fixes #400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2016
Issues: Fixes #400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2016
Issues: Fixes #400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
pjbreaux
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2016
Issues: Fixes #400 Problem: Clustering is needed for creating a device service group cluster of multiple bigip devices Analysis: This is part of a refactor from a code review that happened offline. It was suggested to refactor the external interface that previously existed with the Cluster class into ClusterManager, TrustDomain, and DeviceGroup classes, which maintain state for their respective operations and data. The interfaces presented by each of the classes above are as uniform as possible, and allow for the ClusterManager to manage the DeviceGroup and TrustDomain with ease. Tests: All previous unit tests and functional tests have been refactored or rewritten in some way. All tests are currently passing.
caphrim007
pushed a commit
to caphrim007/f5-common-python
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Initial commit for cluster_manager module for managing a BigIP cluster Analysis: Initial commit is using one large module to do all of the heavy lifting. Will break out in future commits when common functionality arises Tests: Only manual tests so far
caphrim007
pushed a commit
to caphrim007/f5-common-python
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: For clustering, we need to break apart the large cluster_manager module into something less Blob(ish) Analysis: Broke apart similar functionality for checking/managing the device group into a new module, the device_group_manager Tests: All manual tests still
caphrim007
pushed a commit
to caphrim007/f5-common-python
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Structure of clustering needs some refactoring and some testing Analysis: Moved the cluster modules into a cluster/ directory under f5. Also created some functional tests for these features. So we have something to hold onto. Tests: Three func tests exists now. The idea is that we can create, scale up, scale down, and teardown a cluster. We do this with a sync-failover and sync-only cluster type and then we create a cluster, only to delete the cluster_manager object, reinitialize with the same devices, then teardown that existing cluster.
caphrim007
pushed a commit
to caphrim007/f5-common-python
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2016
Issues: Fixes F5Networks#400 Problem: Clustering is needed for creating a device service group cluster of multiple bigip devices Analysis: This is part of a refactor from a code review that happened offline. It was suggested to refactor the external interface that previously existed with the Cluster class into ClusterManager, TrustDomain, and DeviceGroup classes, which maintain state for their respective operations and data. The interfaces presented by each of the classes above are as uniform as possible, and allow for the ClusterManager to manage the DeviceGroup and TrustDomain with ease. Tests: All previous unit tests and functional tests have been refactored or rewritten in some way. All tests are currently passing.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
We need this feature for several customers. Given multiple BigIP objects, the cluster will perform the following operations:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: