R1.4.12: Ability define conditionals on nodes and edges which would effectively enable selective traversal dependent on the condition evaluating to true.

[wnilkamal]

R1.4.12: Ability define conditionals on nodes and edges which would effectively enable selective traversal dependent on the condition evaluating to true.

Note: This means if a conditional fails on a node or an edge there will be no further traversal till the end node. The variables already set in the path traversed will be either considered or not considered as a valid scenario set depending on the global job configuration variable set.

[mibrahim]

How is that different from what we have ? Can we come up with an example
and discuss how to express that in scxml ?
On Jul 24, 2014 11:16 PM, "Nil Weerasinghe" notifications@github.com
wrote:

R1.4.12: Ability define conditionals on nodes and edges which would
effectively enable selective traversal dependent on the condition
evaluating to true.

Note: This means if a conditional fails on a node or an edge there will be
no further traversal till the end node. The variables already set in the
path traversed will be either considered or not considered as a valid
scenario set depending on the global job configuration variable set.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#62.

[bryantrobbins]

@wnilkamal can we agree that defining conditionals only on edges is OK?

This is necessary to comply with standard SCXML. We could write our own extensions to nodes to be conditional, but also I think it's more consistent to annotate edges.

[bryantrobbins]

Spoke with @wnilkamal and he agrees this is satisfied by conditionals provided in transitions.