New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pim6d: Completing "ipv6 mld" config command. #11485
Conversation
dd61696
to
c0ccc7b
Compare
c0ccc7b
to
33cf967
Compare
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6163/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: Unknown Log URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6164/artifact/TOPO9U18AMD64/ErrorLog/ Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 9: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULContinuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6169/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
This is, sadly, duplicate with some pending work I also have… … and the reason I haven't opened it as PR yet is that we still don't have a proper solution / approach to deal with the "enable" vs. "setting parameters" problem, and allocating the pim interface structure vs. actually having the interface enabled. |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek N R <abnr@vmware.com>
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
ci:rerun ospf failure |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-6302/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not currently considering this for review for the same reason I haven't pushed out my own further MLD CLI work — the general YANG / MLD / PIM interface creation logic should be fixed first. I'd rather not keep piling onto things that are built on a foundation of rickety sand.
@eqvinox : Can you please review this. I think it's better to move ahead right now with this and as you are working on the YANG stuff, once its done, you can push that change. We are working on the topotest changes for pimv6 and it will need these CLIs as well. We have 11581 as well which depends on this PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Abhishek N R abnr@vmware.com