-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mobility API and physics interface under permissive license. #259
Comments
Like build.h, I want to relicense it to public domain. |
@a1batross any progress? |
@nekonomicon we didn't make physics/render API but for mobility API header I would like to request a permission from @mittorn and you, as you both contributed to it previously in old engine. As for FOSS headers for HLSDK, I've started documenting API interfaces, so somebody else could rewrite them from scratch. As this process is iterative (I'm mostly cross-referencing Quake and Quake II sources as a base), it will at some point involve Xash's physics API too. |
I give my permission. |
I give my permission
|
…ip ci] See GitHub issue: FWGS/hlsdk-portable#259
https://lists.sr.ht/~a1batross/xash3d-fwgs/%3C20240103045042.416609-1-a1ba.omarov%40gmail.com%3E Not sure if we actually should go with Unlicense for that. I don't think anyone will ever complain but some people disagree and recommend CC-0 over it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Unlicense |
I've heard public domain software are prohibited by law in some countries or something like that. |
I don't think that we should care about that bureaucracy absurd |
That's what I meant when I said "nobody will ever complain". Permissive license actually is fine too. I think picking 2-clause BSD would be enough, it's a popular and proven choice. It only requires attribution, but the whole purpose here is just allow inclusion in HLSDK. |
See GitHub issue: FWGS/hlsdk-portable#259 Signed-off-by: Alibek Omarov <a1ba.omarov@gmail.com>
Subj
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: