-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extract getter/setter/field name mangling from BeanUtil
into pluggable AccessorNamingStrategy
#2800
Milestone
Comments
cowtowncoder
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2020
cowtowncoder
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2020
cowtowncoder
changed the title
Extract getter/setter name mangling from
Extract getter/setter name mangling from Aug 28, 2020
BeanUtil
into pluggable handlerBeanUtil
into pluggable handler (AccessorNamingStrategy
)
cowtowncoder
changed the title
Extract getter/setter name mangling from
Extract getter/setter/field name mangling from Aug 28, 2020
BeanUtil
into pluggable handler (AccessorNamingStrategy
)BeanUtil
into pluggable AccessorNamingStrategy
cowtowncoder
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 13, 2020
Completed implementation:
and latter is configurable regarding getter/is-getter/setter/with-method prefixes, as well as optional validity checking for base name. |
This was referenced Oct 13, 2020
Open
This was referenced Nov 9, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Since there seem to be customizable aspects to how getter and setter implicit names are auto-detected, we should extract current
BeanUtil
static methods into some kind of pluggable handler, and let that be (re)configured by users (or perhaps by language module(s)?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: