-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 396
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support $slice
projection query operator
#518
Support $slice
projection query operator
#518
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #518 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 61.03% 61.62% +0.58%
==========================================
Files 121 121
Lines 6650 6785 +135
==========================================
+ Hits 4059 4181 +122
- Misses 2081 2086 +5
- Partials 510 518 +8
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
# Conflicts: # internal/handlers/common/projection.go
$slice
projection query operator [WIP]$slice
projection query operator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! 💟
@seeforschauer to be honest, I feel a bit overwhelmed by the scope of this PR, I'm afraid it may never end 😅 |
@GinGin3203 let it be a day :-) I fully understand this :) Some of my own PRs are also very big. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and addressing the work that needs to be done on JSONSyntax in a separate issue?
Let's drop JSONSyntax
completely. See #518 (comment)
@AlekSi as I understand, this PR can be merged? |
I will take a look ASAP |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Closes #362.