UPPSF-131 Added parameterised waiting interval in the call to contentResolver (document-store-api) to avoid getting still not existing content there

[gkazakov111]

No description provided.

[rnov]

as we agreed, all defer calls must handle errors a candidates to check :

./forwarder/forwarder.go:48:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./forwarder/forwarder_test.go:35:		defer r.Body.Close()
./forwarder/forwarder_test.go:57:	defer mockServer.Close()
./forwarder/forwarder_test.go:68:	defer mockServer.Close()
./forwarder/forwarder_test.go:80:	defer mockServer.Close()
./relations/relationsResolver_test.go:24:	defer file.Close()
./relations/relationsResolver.go:33:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./healthcheck.go:129:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./common_test.go:50:	defer file.Close()
./unfolder.go:73:	defer req.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:32:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:54:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:65:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:86:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:100:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:127:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:151:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:176:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:201:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:230:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:254:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:285:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:315:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:345:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:378:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:404:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:443:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:461:	defer server.Close()
./unfolder_test.go:485:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./resolver/contentResolver.go:34:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./resolver/contentResolver.go:113:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./resolver/contentResolver_test.go:30:	defer file.Close()
./resolver/uuidResolver_test.go:86:	defer file.Close()
./main_test.go:39:	defer writerServer.Close()
./main_test.go:42:	defer contentResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:45:	defer relationsResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:52:	defer unfolderServer.Close()
./main_test.go:59:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./main_test.go:79:	defer writerServer.Close()
./main_test.go:82:	defer contentResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:85:	defer relationsResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:92:	defer unfolderServer.Close()
./main_test.go:99:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./main_test.go:119:	defer writerServer.Close()
./main_test.go:122:	defer contentResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:125:	defer relationsResolverServer.Close()
./main_test.go:132:	defer unfolderServer.Close()
./main_test.go:138:	defer resp.Body.Close()
./main_test.go:161:		defer r.Body.Close()
./main_test.go:67:	json.Unmarshal(body, &healthResult)
./main_test.go:107:	json.Unmarshal(body, &healthResult)

[rnov]

what's the point in general to use pointers for unmutable values like string or ints ?

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-4.04%) to 78.78% when pulling f7c045a on fix/UPPSF-131-different-notifs-count-EU-US into c8ec645 on master.