feat: remove contract activation control by actor

[brew0722]

Description

closes: #467

Motivation and context

• remove contract access control by actor
• remove contract status access config

How has this been tested?

• re-add inactive contract tests using gov proposal

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Checklist:

• I followed the contributing guidelines and code of conduct.
• I have added a relevant changelog to CHANGELOG.md
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have updated API documentation client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #470 (e6abf41) into main (d2ba9c1) will increase coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #470      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.73%   55.78%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         719      719              
  Lines       73921    73829      -92     
==========================================
- Hits        41201    41187      -14     
+ Misses      29609    29535      -74     
+ Partials     3111     3107       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/wasm/client/cli/new_tx.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/wasm/client/cli/tx.go	14.54% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
x/wasm/handler.go	73.33% <ø> (+3.12%)	⬆️
x/wasm/keeper/msg_server.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/wasm/types/codec.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/wasm/types/params.go	65.82% <ø> (+10.60%)	⬆️
x/wasm/types/tx.go	46.79% <ø> (-1.89%)	⬇️
x/wasm/keeper/authz_policy.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/wasm/keeper/keeper.go	84.85% <100.00%> (-0.81%)	⬇️
snapshots/store.go	71.66% <0.00%> (-1.25%)	⬇️
... and 3 more

[brew0722]

Modifications due to policy changes.
So, it was judged that it was not a bugfix, and it was judged as a feature.

[shiki-tak]

LGTM