Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/planning/update tests multiple output #880

Closed

Conversation

victorgarcia98
Copy link
Contributor

@victorgarcia98 victorgarcia98 commented Oct 19, 2023

Description

This PR updates the solver tests to incorporate the new (multi) output type.

Related Items

#876


  • I agree to contribute to the project under Apache 2 License.
  • To the best of my knowledge, the proposed patch is not based on code under GPL or other license that is incompatible with FlexMeasures

Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
Signed-off-by: Victor Garcia Reolid <victor@seita.nl>
…feature/planning/update-tests-multiple-output
…feature/planning/update-tests-multiple-output
@Flix6x
Copy link
Contributor

Flix6x commented Oct 20, 2023

Just wanted to thank you for having moved these test updates to a separate PR. I'm holding off reviewing, given that we're still discussing sign conventions on PR #879.

Base automatically changed from feature/planning/adapt-scheduler-multiple-output to main October 30, 2023 10:34
@victorgarcia98
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR as the sign switch didn't end up happening on PR #879.

@Flix6x Flix6x deleted the feature/planning/update-tests-multiple-output branch November 7, 2023 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants