Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix typo missed in review #301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024
Merged

fix: Fix typo missed in review #301

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

hardillb
Copy link
Contributor

@hardillb hardillb commented Feb 7, 2024

Description

Forge app looks for db.database not db.db

Related Issue(s)

reported in comment #268 (comment)

Checklist

  • I have read the contribution guidelines
  • Suitable unit/system level tests have been added and they pass
  • Documentation has been updated
    • Upgrade instructions
    • Configuration details
    • Concepts
  • Changes flowforge.yml?
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/helm to update ConfigMap Template
    • Issue/PR raised on FlowFuse/CloudProject to update values for Staging/Production

Labels

  • Backport needed? -> add the backport label
  • Includes a DB migration? -> add the area:migration label

Forge app looks for `db.database` not `db.db`

reported in comment #268 (comment)
@hardillb hardillb self-assigned this Feb 7, 2024
@hardillb hardillb changed the title Fix typo missed in review fix: Fix typo missed in review Feb 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-amd64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-amd64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

file-server:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.0.2-main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 files  ±0  4 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
7 tests ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  7 ❌ ±0 
8 runs  ±0  0 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  8 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:3.1.x-main-linux-arm64 scan results

6 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
2 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   6 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

file-server:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-amd64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

node-red:2.2.3-main-linux-arm64 scan results

26 tests  ±0    0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 4 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0   26 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

forge-k8s:main-linux-arm64 scan results

1 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
4 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
1 files   ±0   1 ❌ ±0 

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit 5163d0d. ± Comparison against base commit 82713e5.

@ppawlowski ppawlowski merged commit 4fedc21 into main Feb 7, 2024
41 of 42 checks passed
@ppawlowski ppawlowski deleted the hardillb-patch-2 branch February 7, 2024 10:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants