Minor enhancements in Docs/Stochastic Forcing section

[navidcy]

• Fixes warning/complaining of Docs for duplicate ref to TwoDNavierStokes.energy_work().
• Adds definition for Brownian motion W_t.
• Some code beautifications.

[glwagner]

Do we use subscript notation for derivatives anywhere? Could confuse the definition of W_t, which is not a time-derivative.

[navidcy]

Do we use subscript notation for derivatives anywhere? Could confuse the definition of W_t, which is not a time-derivative.

I don’t think we do use subscripts for derivatives...

[liasiegelman]

I believe W_t is the standard notation for a Wiener process. You could maybe add continuity as a property like : "4. Continuity. With probability 1, W_t is continuous in t" ? Although I admit, it's really a detail...

[navidcy]

Note the sentence before property 1.

[liasiegelman]

oki :) On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:55 PM Navid C. Constantinou < notifications@github.com> wrote:

…

Note the sentence before properly 1. > On 13 Jan 2021, at 15:47, Lia Siegelman ***@***.***> wrote: > >  > I believe W_t is the standard notation for a Wiener process. You may want to add a fourth property though : 4. Continuity. With probability 1, W_t is continuous in t. > > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. — You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#184 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI5YTLJOCLGJMWFMPQVTKELSZU7VRANCNFSM4V4IOVSQ> .

[navidcy]

so shall I merge?
feel free to critique the whole Stochastic Forcing section if you like ;)

[glwagner]

so shall I merge?
feel free to critique the whole Stochastic Forcing section if you like ;)

That was the only "issue" I found after a quick scan. Merge!