Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plan integration of Images that are on the image server #219

Closed
edickens opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Plan integration of Images that are on the image server #219

edickens opened this issue Oct 17, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@edickens
Copy link

edickens commented Oct 17, 2014

Integrating the image server, even on a manual basis, is key to how transcribing works.
We need to agree how this will work in F2 V1.1.
While discussing this, we need to have some idea as to how it will work when integrated in V2 or V3 so that we don't end up undoing changes we have just made.

@PatReynolds
Copy link

Eric also has 'All images to match register records and 'Add image numbers. - again: what about backfit to all the records online that do actually have images, but which were not recorded on the Transcription at the time. ' as stories with this number

@edickens
Copy link
Author

Hi  Pat,

As with all new facilities, the best we can do is to included this
information in all new work we do it, from the time that the program
is working.  That will be, in the first instance, when new images
are uploaded or past images are allocated for transcribing.  Then,
when convenient, we can add this information to past transcriptions.
This will be when a Coordinator needs to check a researchers
question and looks up the image and then they can link the
entry/batch to the image(s).

The images on the image server are well organised and I can do quite
a lot when the program is working.

There will be two levels of matching.  Batch and Entry.  Batch level
will be the easiest to set up and use, provided there is a browse
facility though the matching images.  So to sort out past images, we
can do this at batch level.

Eric
_____________________________________

Eric J Dickens
FreeREG Chairman
On 22/03/2016 16:18, PatReynolds wrote:

  Eric also has 'All images to match register records and 'Add
    image numbers. - again: what about backfit to all the records
    online that do actually have images, but which were not recorded
    on the Transcription at the time. ' as stories with this number
  —
    You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
    Reply to this email directly or view
      it on GitHub

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants