Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PIPE-167 Added appveyor markdown in readme #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2019

Conversation

msbahal
Copy link

@msbahal msbahal commented Nov 5, 2019

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 5, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 84.277% when pulling 9396b8a on PIPE-167-Add-appveyor-info-in-readme into 2517ae2 on master.

@JoshChristie
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good.

Lets ignore the SSL error for 0.5 as the version will be bumped soon. See here

@msbahal msbahal force-pushed the PIPE-167-Add-appveyor-info-in-readme branch from 40d0883 to 9396b8a Compare November 11, 2019 11:40
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master       #6   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.27%   84.27%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         159      159           
=======================================
  Hits          134      134           
  Misses         25       25

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2517ae2...9396b8a. Read the comment docs.

@msbahal msbahal merged commit 9396b8a into master Nov 11, 2019
@msbahal msbahal deleted the PIPE-167-Add-appveyor-info-in-readme branch November 11, 2019 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants