-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A second 'fog of war' layer #49
Comments
Yes, this will be a very important feature. In fact, I don't think keeping units on the map will do (because of the size of the map and because of the threat of worms). But, this is where the Spacing Guild can come in. Just like in the books you should be able to bribe the Spacing Guild for revealing the map (clear fog of war). But I also think this could have some variations, like:
|
That does sound very interesting! It would also have consequences for an eventual multiplayer mode where your standing (measured in 'contributions'?) with the Spacing Guild influences how much, if any, of your units and structures are revealed to other players when they attempt to buy some vision in an area. There is also a difference between buying an update for an area, so you can see if there are structures there or what the map looks like and buying sight range for a period of time, so you can see if units are moving through an area for the duration of that. Maybe a choice needs to be made on which are available, or perhaps both are but for different prices? |
This issue is ready to go. All required elements are built. |
Many modern strategy games have a second shroud layer that is revealed only when within living unit's sight radius, anything else is remained covered. Terrain is still visible, along with structures previously scouted, but this information is not updated until a unit's sight passes through again.
This makes it more important to keep units on the map, as you will have no knowledge of enemy troop movements, even through previous explored areas, unless your units are nearby to see them.
I believe this would add a very interesting element to strategy, as many contemporary strategy games have proven already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: