Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read folder structure correctly for custom symbols. #2856

Closed
vint66 opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Read folder structure correctly for custom symbols. #2856

vint66 opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@vint66
Copy link

vint66 commented Sep 21, 2019

GNS3 v2.2.0rc5

I would be nice if GNS3 server can read custom symbols from nested folder and show them grouped just like it was done for affinity symbols.

As for now workaround is to put folder with symbols to /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/gns3server/symbols/

@grossmj grossmj added this to the 2.3 milestone Sep 23, 2019
@grossmj grossmj self-assigned this Sep 27, 2019
@grossmj
Copy link
Member

grossmj commented Jul 15, 2020

This should be supported already. Please comment if this isn't the case. Thanks.

@grossmj grossmj closed this as completed Jul 15, 2020
@vint66
Copy link
Author

vint66 commented Jul 15, 2020

I see 2.2.11 still has same issue.

Mode detailed explanation:

This is folder where gns3 will be looking for symbols: /opt/gns3/symbols/ (it is form gns3 config).
In this folder I have another folder - 3DN where all my 3d symbols located. I might have another folder "sibling" of 3DN with more symbols.

The issue:
GNS3 will merge all symbols in all nested folders and show then as "Custom symbols" one category.

However it would be nicer to have folder read correctly and show it as you see with 3dn folder on screenshot (this is same 3DN placed in /usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/gns3server/symbols/.

Basically my ask is to make same behavior but for subfolders in /opt/gns3/symbols/.

Screen Shot 2020-07-15 at 9 53 35 AM

Hopefully it make sense. Let me know if need more info.

@grossmj grossmj reopened this Jul 15, 2020
@grossmj
Copy link
Member

grossmj commented Jul 19, 2020

Hopefully it make sense. Let me know if need more info.

Ok, got it this time. This will work in version 2.3

@grossmj grossmj closed this as completed Jul 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants