Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement toUintXX for 64, 96 and 128 bits #25

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2019
Merged

Implement toUintXX for 64, 96 and 128 bits #25

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 26, 2019

Conversation

bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor

@bh2smith bh2smith commented Jun 14, 2019

Closes #24

Test Plan: run truffle test.

GNSPS and others added 3 commits February 27, 2019 02:16
* (WIP) Upgrade to Solidity v0.5.0 (#21)

* (refactor) Changed codebase to Solidity v0.5.0

* Style changes
* Added `memory` everywhere to bytes and strings
* `target.call(data)` now returns a tuple

* Adding note about compiler support in the README + typo fix

* Replaced the ThrowProxy pattern for a better v0.5.x one

ThrowProxy was giving problems while testing with the JS-VM with the Constantinople hard-fork. So I changed the tests to stop using that pattern and use function selectors since that's now a thing.

It is cleaner now.

* Update package-lock.json

* Bump version to v0.0.7

* Bump version in package-lock.json

* Update dependency versions

* Fix typo in package-lock.json
@GNSPS
Copy link
Owner

GNSPS commented Jun 18, 2019

Just redid some of the bogus data in the tests to match the previous style but other than that LGTM! 😄 Thank you for the contribution @bh2smith!

@GNSPS GNSPS changed the base branch from master to develop June 18, 2019 17:29
@GNSPS
Copy link
Owner

GNSPS commented Jun 18, 2019

I just pointed the PR to the develop branch. Could you please just resolve the conflicts by committing to your branch?

@bh2smith
Copy link
Contributor Author

bh2smith commented Jun 19, 2019

Thanks @GNSPS, I believe the conflicts have been resolved appropriately. Is there a release schedule planned for these changes?

@GNSPS
Copy link
Owner

GNSPS commented Jun 26, 2019

I'm sorry for the delay, @bh2smith!!

I'll merge and release right away! 😄

@GNSPS GNSPS merged commit 658e88b into GNSPS:develop Jun 26, 2019
GNSPS added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2019
* Implement toUintXX for 64, 96 and 128 bits (#25)

* include toUintXX for 64, 96 and 128 bits

* Update tests to follow same style as the others

* Fix README with correct example of import from NPM

* Update dependencies

* Bump version to 0.0.8

Fixes #27
@GNSPS
Copy link
Owner

GNSPS commented Jun 26, 2019

Released in both EPM and NPM! 😄 🙌

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants