-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add test cases for perf-x database #1597
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ | ||
/** | ||
* Copyright 2017 Google Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
* | ||
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | ||
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | ||
* You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | ||
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | ||
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | ||
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | ||
* limitations under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
|
||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
/* eslint-env mocha */ | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
|
||
const PerfXDatabase = require('../../../performance-experiment/experiment-database/database'); | ||
const sampleResults = require('../../../../lighthouse-core/test/results/sample'); | ||
|
||
describe('Perf-X Database', function() { | ||
it('can store and output experiments data', () => { | ||
const perfXDatabase = new PerfXDatabase(); | ||
process.on('exit', () => perfXDatabase.clear()); | ||
|
||
const testCases = [ | ||
{ | ||
flags: { | ||
'blockedUrlPatterns': ['.woff2', '.jpg'], | ||
'disable-network-throttling': false | ||
}, | ||
results: sampleResults | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
flags: { | ||
'blockedUrlPatterns': ['.woff'], | ||
'disable-cpu-throttling': true, | ||
'deep-reference': {'an-object': {'an array': ['something', 'an element']}} | ||
}, | ||
results: { | ||
generatedTime: new Date(2015, 6, 37, 0, 12, 55, 60).toJSON(), | ||
url: 'http://google.com/', | ||
else: 'some-data' | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
flags: { | ||
'blockedUrlPatterns': ['.woff', 'cat.jpg', '*'], | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. pretty odd we have this mix of camel casing and not in the flags. Why arent the disable flags in camelcase? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. fixed |
||
'disable-cpu-throttling': false, | ||
'disable-device-emulation': true | ||
}, | ||
results: { | ||
'generatedTime': new Date(2014, 5, 36, 23, 56, 54, 99).toJSON(), | ||
'url': 'http://mdn.com/', | ||
'audits': [{'is-on-https': {'score': true}}], | ||
} | ||
} | ||
]; | ||
|
||
testCases.forEach(testCase => { | ||
testCase.key = perfXDatabase.saveData(testCase.flags, testCase.results); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
testCases.forEach(testCase => { | ||
assert.deepStrictEqual(perfXDatabase.getFlags(testCase.key), testCase.flags); | ||
assert.deepStrictEqual(perfXDatabase.getResults(testCase.key), testCase.results); | ||
}); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('prevents data from being changed by reference', () => { | ||
const perfXDatabase = new PerfXDatabase(); | ||
process.on('exit', () => perfXDatabase.clear()); | ||
|
||
const flags = { | ||
'blockedUrlPatterns': ['.woff', '.jpg', 'random'], | ||
'disable-cpu-throttling': false, | ||
'some-random-flag': 'some random value' | ||
}; | ||
const results = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(sampleResults)); | ||
|
||
const key = perfXDatabase.saveData(flags, results); | ||
const flagsBeforeChange = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(perfXDatabase.getFlags(key))); | ||
const resultsBeforeChange = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(perfXDatabase.getResults(key))); | ||
|
||
// data won't be changed when the falgs/results passed to perfXDatabase.saveData is changed | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. falgs => flags There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. fixed. |
||
flags.blockedUrlPatterns.push('something'); | ||
results.url = undefined; | ||
|
||
// data won't be changed when the falgs/results returned by perfXDatabase is changed | ||
perfXDatabase.getFlags(key)['another attribute'] = 'random value'; | ||
perfXDatabase.getResults(key).aggregations.push('something-else'); | ||
|
||
assert.deepStrictEqual(perfXDatabase.getFlags(key), flagsBeforeChange); | ||
assert.deepStrictEqual(perfXDatabase.getResults(key), resultsBeforeChange); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
it('returns correct timestamps', () => { | ||
const perfXDatabase = new PerfXDatabase(); | ||
process.on('exit', () => perfXDatabase.clear()); | ||
|
||
const testCases = [ | ||
{ | ||
results: sampleResults | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
results: { | ||
generatedTime: new Date(2015, 6, 37, 0, 12, 55, 60).toJSON(), | ||
url: 'http://google.com/', | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
results: { | ||
'generatedTime': new Date(2014, 5, 36, 23, 56, 54, 99).toJSON(), | ||
'url': 'http://mdn.com/', | ||
} | ||
} | ||
]; | ||
|
||
testCases.forEach(testCase => { | ||
testCase.key = perfXDatabase.saveData({}, testCase.results); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
testCases.forEach(testCase => { | ||
assert.strictEqual(perfXDatabase.timeStamps[testCase.key], testCase.results.generatedTime); | ||
}); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. how about an assertion about (I presume this would fail right now, until the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thx for your advice. I will add that. |
||
}); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'd put this in an
afterEach
block (some other tests have them)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and do you want to use a fresh database for each of these test cases? if so you could do setup/teardown in beforeEach/afterEach inside the
describe
and do each test case in their ownit
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't know that! Thx for your advice
Are you referring to
testCases
or 'it'? I want to test the whether database is capable of storing multiple data sets here. I will renametestCases
todataSets
to make it clear.