Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove podname from port forward key #2047

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2019

Conversation

priyawadhwa
Copy link
Contributor

This way, when pods are regenerated, they will be mapped to the same
port.

This should fix some of the issues users have been facing in #1815 and #1594.

This way, when pods are regenerated, they will be mapped to the same
port.

This should fix some of the issues users have been facing in GoogleContainerTools#1815 and GoogleContainerTools#1594.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #2047 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2047   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.93%   55.93%           
=======================================
  Files         178      178           
  Lines        7689     7689           
=======================================
  Hits         4301     4301           
  Misses       2973     2973           
  Partials      415      415
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/skaffold/kubernetes/port_forward.go 47.91% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4a4d696...70f53c5. Read the comment docs.

@nkubala nkubala merged commit e87f39b into GoogleContainerTools:master May 1, 2019
@tejal29
Copy link
Member

tejal29 commented May 1, 2019

is there a way to add a test for it? The test will help not breaking it in future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants