Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

2.3.0-rc1: ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment. #3997

Closed
frinnst opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

2.3.0-rc1: ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment. #3997

frinnst opened this issue Jul 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
@bernd
Labels
bug
Milestone
2.3.0

Comments

@frinnst
Copy link

frinnst commented Jul 14, 2017 •
edited by joschi

When using "Index Size" rotation strategy (5GB in my case) my graylog-server.log fills up with these messages:

2017-07-14T08:58:10.087Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T08:58:20.100Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T08:58:30.092Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T09:10:50.080Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T09:11:00.188Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T09:11:10.087Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T09:11:20.100Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.
2017-07-14T09:11:30.085Z ERROR [AbstractRotationStrategy] Cannot perform rotation at this moment.

If I switch to "Index Time" for example the log becomes quiet again.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Switch Index rotation to "Index Size"
  2. tail -f /var/log/graylog-server/server.log
  • Graylog Version: 2.3.0-rc1
  • Elasticsearch Version: 5.5.0
  • MongoDB Version: 2.6.12
  • Operating System: ubuntu 16.04
  • Browser version: Various
@bernd bernd self-assigned this Jul 17, 2017
@bernd bernd added the bug label Jul 17, 2017
@bernd bernd added this to the 2.3.0 milestone Jul 17, 2017
@bernd
Copy link
Member

bernd commented Jul 17, 2017

Thank you for the report. I am able to reproduce that and currently work on a fix.

bernd added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2017
@bernd
Fix number parsing in Indices#getStoreSiztInBytes()
12cc8dc 
The size might be an integer instead of a long.

Fixes #3997
@bernd bernd mentioned this issue Jul 17, 2017
Merged
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Jul 17, 2017
joschi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2017
@bernd @joschi
Fix number parsing in Indices#getStoreSiztInBytes() (#4008)
b29b103 
The size might be an integer instead of a long

Fixes #3997
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Jul 17, 2017
bernd added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2017
@bernd
Fix number parsing in Indices#getStoreSiztInBytes() (#4008)
09ad386 
The size might be an integer instead of a long

Fixes #3997
(cherry picked from commit b29b103)
@bernd bernd mentioned this issue Jul 17, 2017
Merged
@bernd
Copy link
Member

bernd commented Jul 17, 2017

@frinnst This will be fixed in the next 2.3 release candidate.

joschi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2017
@bernd @joschi
Fix number parsing in Indices#getStoreSiztInBytes() (#4011)
b78c084 
The size might be an integer instead of a long

Refs #4008
Fixes #3997
(cherry picked from commit b29b103)
mariussturm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2017
@bernd
Fix number parsing in Indices#getStoreSiztInBytes() (#4008)
1727605 
The size might be an integer instead of a long

Fixes #3997
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bernd bernd

Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bernd @frinnst