test(flow): ignore flow tests for now #4377
Conversation
WalkthroughThe modifications focus on standardizing and anonymizing SQL query patterns within test cases. Specific terms and patterns have been redacted or replaced with placeholders, ensuring consistency and compliance with updated guidelines. These changes improve readability and maintainability without altering the core functionality of the SQL queries. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
discord9
changed the title
discord9
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4377 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.16% 84.88% -0.28%
==========================================
Files 1074 1074
Lines 191953 191953
==========================================
- Hits 163477 162946 -531
- Misses 28476 29007 +531 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.result (2 hunks)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.sql (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.sql
Additional comments not posted (3)
tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.result (3)
23-29: Verify the effect of redactions on SQL analysis clarity.The redactions in the SQL comments (
-- SQLNESS REPLACE (...) REDACTED) aim to simplify or obscure certain details. While this aligns with the PR's intent to adjust SQL query plans and execution steps, it's crucial to verify that these redactions do not remove essential information needed for understanding or debugging the SQL analysis.Verification successful
Verified: The redactions in the SQL comments do not remove essential information needed for understanding or debugging the SQL analysis.
The replacements and redactions are consistent across multiple files and focus on removing sensitive or irrelevant details without impacting the overall clarity of the SQL analysis.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the redactions still allow for a clear understanding of the SQL analysis. # Test: Search for similar patterns in other SQL analysis files to compare the level of detail. rg --type sql -A 5 $'SQLNESS REPLACE'Length of output: 33108
49-53: Check for consistency in handling of partitioning and scanning operations.The redaction of partitioning details and the sequence scan operation (
SeqScan) might affect the reproducibility of tests and the understanding of data distribution and access patterns. It is essential to verify that similar operations in other parts of the codebase are handled consistently and that sufficient information is available for performance analysis.Verification successful
Consistency in handling of partitioning and scanning operations verified
The redaction of partitioning details and sequence scan operations (
SeqScan) is consistent across multiple test files, indicating an intentional practice. However, this might affect the reproducibility of tests and the understanding of data distribution and access patterns.
tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/subqueries.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/order_by.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/join_10_tables.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/analyze.resulttests/cases/standalone/common/tql-explain-analyze/analyze.resulttests/cases/standalone/common/range/nest.resultPlease ensure that sufficient information is available for performance analysis.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent handling of partitioning and scanning operations across the codebase. # Test: Search for similar operations to ensure they are described consistently. rg --type sql -A 5 $'RepartitionExec'Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent handling of partitioning and scanning operations across the codebase. # Test: Search for similar operations to ensure they are described consistently. rg 'RepartitionExec' -A 5 rg 'SeqScan' -A 5Length of output: 23326
38-46: Assess the impact of redacted execution plans on performance tuning and debugging.The execution plan details have been significantly redacted, which could potentially obscure critical performance metrics and debugging information. It's important to ensure that these redactions are temporary and that detailed plans can still be accessed if needed for deeper analysis or performance tuning.
Verification successful
Detailed execution plans are accessible elsewhere in the codebase.
The search results indicate that detailed execution plans, including
MergeScanExec,ProjectionExec, andAggregateExec, are present in various files. These details are not redacted in all instances, suggesting that the redactions intests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.resultare specific to that context and not a global practice.
- Files with detailed execution plans:
src/query/src/dist_plan.rssrc/query/src/dist_plan/planner.rssrc/query/src/dist_plan/merge_scan.rssrc/query/src/analyze.rstests/cases/standalone/common/range/nest.resulttests/cases/standalone/common/tql-explain-analyze/explain.resulttests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.resulttests/cases/distributed/optimizer/filter_push_down.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/analyze.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/order_by.resulttests/cases/distributed/explain/join_10_tables.resultCategory:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that detailed execution plans can still be accessed for performance tuning. # Test: Search for execution plan details in other test results to ensure consistency. rg --type sql -A 5 $'MergeScanExec'Length of output: 34
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that detailed execution plans can still be accessed for performance tuning. # Test: Search for execution plan details in other test results to ensure consistency. rg --type sql -A 5 'ExecutionPlan' --type sql -A 5 'ProjectionExec' --type sql -A 5 'AggregateExec'Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that detailed execution plans can still be accessed for performance tuning. # Test: Search for execution plan details in other test results to ensure consistency. rg --type sql -A 5 'ExecutionPlan' rg --type sql -A 5 'ProjectionExec' rg --type sql -A 5 'AggregateExec'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that detailed execution plans can still be accessed for performance tuning. # Test: Search for execution plan details in other test results to ensure consistency. rg -A 10 'MergeScanExec' rg -A 10 'ProjectionExec' rg -A 10 'AggregateExec' rg -A 10 'ExecutionPlan'Length of output: 179482
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.result (3 hunks)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.sql (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.result
- tests/cases/standalone/optimizer/last_value.sql
I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.
Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)
What's changed and what's your intention?
ignore flow sqlness tests for now until a
flush_flowfunction is added for better test harnessChecklist
Summary by CodeRabbit