Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: supports name in object storage config #4630

Merged

Conversation

killme2008
Copy link
Contributor

@killme2008 killme2008 commented Aug 28, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

#4444

What's changed and what's your intention?

Main changes:

  • Adds name field to s3, oss, gcs and azblob configurations.
  • When creating tables, Use the name field to find the provider.
  • Fallback to provider type name when the name field is empty.

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.

@killme2008 killme2008 marked this pull request as ready for review August 28, 2024 03:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@killme2008 killme2008 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2024 03:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs-required This change requires docs update. label Aug 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. and removed docs-required This change requires docs update. labels Aug 28, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@fengjiachun fengjiachun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@killme2008 killme2008 force-pushed the feature/object-storage-provider-name branch from 47a48df to 746f30e Compare August 28, 2024 07:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 15 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.61%. Comparing base (f0e2d6e) to head (c54f211).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4630      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.84%   84.61%   -0.23%     
==========================================
  Files        1105     1105              
  Lines      199056   199153      +97     
==========================================
- Hits       168886   168521     -365     
- Misses      30170    30632     +462     

@killme2008 killme2008 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 2, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 2, 2024
@waynexia waynexia added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 2, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 2, 2024
@MichaelScofield MichaelScofield added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 3, 2024
@killme2008 killme2008 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 3, 2024
@killme2008 killme2008 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit a612b67 Sep 3, 2024
40 checks passed
@killme2008 killme2008 deleted the feature/object-storage-provider-name branch September 3, 2024 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants