Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CJK: Implicit spacing between CJK and Latin does not work #170

Closed
ftake opened this issue Apr 30, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

CJK: Implicit spacing between CJK and Latin does not work #170

ftake opened this issue Apr 30, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@ftake
Copy link

ftake commented Apr 30, 2016

Between CJK and Latin words, 1/4 spaces have been inserted implicitly since Scribus 1.5.0 (or 1.4.x). However, it does not work with CTL branch.

Note 1

Like LibreOffice Writer's Paragraph Style > Asian Typography > Apply spacing between Asian, Latin and complex text, It is better that this implicit spacing can be turned off with paragraph style because we sometimes do not need this spacing, for example, while writing source code.

Note 2

The width of implicit spacing may change for justification like normal spaces, which was not implemented in 1.5.1 (bug).

Other info

Test data is on #143

The infomation used to impliment at the first time was here:
https://sites.google.com/a/borndigital.jp/scribus/scribus-en/line-composition

@khaledhosny
Copy link

I was expected this since it seems the code that flags possible implicit space insertion was removed early in the development of boxes model and no replacement was made, I’ll give it a look.

@khaledhosny
Copy link

Has this been fixed or is it still there?

@khaledhosny
Copy link

Found the root of the issue, please test and reopen if you think this is not fixed.

@ftake
Copy link
Author

ftake commented May 6, 2016

looks the same with 1.5.1 (in both good and bad points)

@khaledhosny
Copy link

I’d like to fix the bad points if you can list them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants