Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need RIG_LEVEL_SWR implemented #1423

Closed
mdblack98 opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Need RIG_LEVEL_SWR implemented #1423

mdblack98 opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement fixed Issue has been fixed
Milestone
4.6

Comments

@mdblack98
Copy link
Contributor

RIG_LEVEL_SWR needs to added to the following rigs
TS-990
@mdblack98 mdblack98 added this to the 4.6 milestone Nov 10, 2023
mdblack98 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2023
@mdblack98
Add SWR for TS990
5059ec8 
#1423
mdblack98 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2023
@mdblack98
Add new get_SWR function for FLRig
1374ee5 
#1423
mdblack98 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2023
@mdblack98
Get scaling correct (i.e.none) for FLRig get_SWR
6351d5d 
#1423
mdblack98 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2023
@mdblack98
Fix TS990S SWR read -- strange behavior of RM command reading first R…
e7786ce 
…M turned on for read

New SWR table too for TS990S
#1423
@GeoBaltz
Copy link
Contributor

The TS-990 RM command has the same problem as the TS-890S - if the rig has recording turned on, the ALC value is always returned by 'RM;' as the first part of the response, and there's no way to turn it off. I'll try to generate a PR to use the ts890.c code I wrote for the TS-990.

@mdblack98
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does it return two RM status messages or just ALC? Can you show me the reply to the RM; command in this situation?

@mdblack98 mdblack98 added the fixed Issue has been fixed label Dec 30, 2023
@mdblack98
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe this has been fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement fixed Issue has been fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.6
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mdblack98 @GeoBaltz