Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented negative and positive validation rules #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2018

Conversation

PeeHaa
Copy link
Contributor

@PeeHaa PeeHaa commented Dec 3, 2018

Closes #11

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 49

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.0009%) to 99.893%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 47: 0.0009%
Covered Lines: 931
Relevant Lines: 932

💛 - Coveralls

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 3, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 49

  • 8 of 8 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.0009%) to 99.893%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 47: 0.0009%
Covered Lines: 931
Relevant Lines: 932

💛 - Coveralls

@PeeHaa PeeHaa merged commit d67ebdc into master Dec 3, 2018
@PeeHaa PeeHaa deleted the positive-negative-rules branch December 5, 2018 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants