Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove JVM target #8582

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Remove JVM target #8582

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Simn
Copy link
Member

@Simn Simn commented Jul 26, 2019

This is gonna make me look bad no matter what, but I'll try to explain anyway. I was working on a JVM target as a hobby project over the years and just so happened to reach a working state earlier this year. My original motivation for this was twofold:

  1. Have a target which could become the main run-time for a Haxe-in-Haxe transition.
  2. Replace the current Java target.

Unfortunately, neither of these are working out. The current Java target actually performs better overall than the JVM target due to some intricate optimizations. Furthermore, the JVM target relies on some API which is unavailable on some android devices, so the current Java target is still needed.

I apologize for any inconveniences this causes, but I would like to pull the plug on this while we still can. We have enough code to maintain already and adding more targets is only going to make this worse. If anyone wants to pick this up and maintain it in the future, I'll be happy to help with that.

@skial skial mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2019
1 task
@Simn
Copy link
Member Author

Simn commented Jul 30, 2019

We had an internal discussion about this and agreed to not drop the target after all. Some team members judge JVM as a Haxe target more positive than I do, so for now we're going to keep it as a low-priority target.

We're going to discuss our strategic focus regarding all this and hopefully come up with a clear plan.

@Simn Simn closed this Jul 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant