sorbet: Update RBI files.

[BrewTestBot]

Autogenerated by the sorbet workflow.

[MikeMcQuaid]

@Bo98 hmm, something weird going on here, any ideas?

[dduugg]

@Bo98 @MikeMcQuaid I think sorbet doesn't like the use of stub_const that was introduced in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/14418/files#diff-15f572e6ca51666d8e2c7be27c665e0e685a95e8028a295beea217f9151dcb16

Marking Library/Homebrew/test/patching_spec.rb as typed: ignore would work as an immediate band-aid (though it would be the only such file in the repo), as would reverting the PR. It might also be possible to convert the stub_consts into let statements instead. I can take a look when I have a bit more bandwidth available.

[MikeMcQuaid]

@dduugg Good catch, missed that, too many other PRs floating around in my head just now 😅. Reverting in #14432 for now; we/you can test regenerating RBI files and running brew typecheck on whatever the new solution is. May just be worth using rubocop:disable there instead 🤷🏻

[Bo98]

I think sorbet doesn't like the use of stub_const that was introduced in https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/14418/files#diff-15f572e6ca51666d8e2c7be27c665e0e685a95e8028a295beea217f9151dcb16

Seems what Sorbet is complaining about is correct tbh. stub_const doesn't really make sense for something that's not actually stubbing an existing constant. Looks like it's defining something new which should be a let instead?