Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-cmd/contributions: Count PR reviews since they're super important #14813

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 26, 2023

Conversation

issyl0
Copy link
Member

@issyl0 issyl0 commented Feb 25, 2023

  • Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • Have you written new tests for your changes? Here's an example.
  • Have you successfully run brew style with your changes locally?
  • Have you successfully run brew typecheck with your changes locally?
  • Have you successfully run brew tests with your changes locally?

  • Part of Enhance brew contributions. #13642.
  • The search APIs don't have that high a rate limit but we shouldn't need to worry about that too much because, to get counts, the JSON response comes with a total_count number.

- The search APIs don't have that high a rate limit but we shouldn't need to
  worry about that too much because, to get counts, the JSON response comes
  with a `total_count` number.
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Member

Review period will end on 2023-02-28 at 00:00:00 UTC.

@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot added the waiting for feedback Merging is blocked until sufficient time has passed for review label Feb 25, 2023
Copy link
Member

@nandahkrishna nandahkrishna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @issyl0!

Test failure:

```
Failure/Error:
  expect(described_class.search_taps("some-formula"))
    .to match(formulae: ["homebrew/foo/some-formula"], casks: ["homebrew/bar/some-cask"])

  GitHub::API asked to yield |[{"items"=>[{"path"=>"Formula/some-formula.rb", "repository"=>{"full_name"=>"Homebrew/homebrew-foo"}}, {"path"=>"Casks/some-cask.rb", "repository"=>{"full_name"=>"Homebrew/homebrew-bar"}}]}]| but no block was passed
```
@issyl0 issyl0 added the critical Critical change which should be shipped as soon as possible. label Feb 26, 2023
@BrewTestBot BrewTestBot removed the waiting for feedback Merging is blocked until sufficient time has passed for review label Feb 26, 2023
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Member

Review period skipped due to critical label.

@issyl0 issyl0 merged commit a13556a into Homebrew:master Feb 26, 2023
@issyl0 issyl0 deleted the contributions-approvals branch February 26, 2023 15:29
@@ -173,6 +175,7 @@ def scan_repositories(repos, person, args)
commits: GitHub.repo_commit_count_for_user(repo_full_name, person, args),
coauthorships: git_log_trailers_cmd(T.must(repo_path), person, "Co-authored-by", args),
signoffs: git_log_trailers_cmd(T.must(repo_path), person, "Signed-off-by", args),
reviews: GitHub.count_issues("", is: "pr", repo: repo_full_name, reviewed_by: person),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely wouldn't have been blocking: is there any way to query the specific type of reviews?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A query like is:pr reviewed-by:#{user} review:approved works to get approvals by the user, but we can't combine review:approved and review:changes_requested. So I thought that just reviewed-by:#{user} was safest to encompass everything.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@issyl0 I'd consider filtering this to just review:approved as it'll get fewer results, requires write access (i.e. "maintainer duties") and is required to move things forward. Thoughts?

issyl0 added a commit to issyl0/brew that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2023
- The `reviewed-by` filter retrieved all reviews for a user, including
  those they'd added to their own PRs. Since it's impossible to click
  the "approve" button on one's own PR, filter this to `review:approved`
  to get "further project goals" kinds of reviews.
- Suggested in Homebrew#14813 (comment).
- Shorten a variable name so I didn't have to split the `count_issues`
  call onto multiple lines since the indentation looked funky when I
  tried it.
issyl0 added a commit to issyl0/brew that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
- The `reviewed-by` filter retrieved all reviews for a user, including
  those they'd added to their own PRs. Since it's impossible to click
  the "approve" button on one's own PR, filter this to `review:approved`
  to get "further project goals" kinds of reviews.
- Suggested in Homebrew#14813 (comment).
issyl0 added a commit to issyl0/brew that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
- The `reviewed-by` filter retrieved all reviews for a user, including
  those they'd added to their own PRs. Since it's impossible to click
  the "approve" button on one's own PR, filter this to `review:approved`
  to get "further project goals" kinds of reviews.
- Suggested in Homebrew#14813 (comment).
@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated PR was locked due to age label Mar 30, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
critical Critical change which should be shipped as soon as possible. outdated PR was locked due to age
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants