-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stepci 2.1.0 (new formula) #113109
stepci 2.1.0 (new formula) #113109
Conversation
@muffl0n thanks for the PR, can you amend your commit message as specified in the style guide? |
Thank you very much for your detailed feedback! Gonna have a look when I'm back at the office. |
Done. I hope it fits the guide now. :) |
end | ||
|
||
test do | ||
assert true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need a better test than assert true
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. |
ping @muffl0n |
Sorry for the silence. Unfortunately I do not have the chance to work on this atm. |
brew install --build-from-source <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>
, where<formula>
is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>
(after doingbrew install --build-from-source <formula>
)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>
?See stepci/stepci#24