Update formulae with multiple licenses

[SeekingMeaning]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install <formula>)?

---

DNM: need to wait for next brew release

[Rylan12]

Casenta isn't listed in the SPDX License List so I don't think we can allow it (it will fail brew audit)

[Rylan12]

Aside from my above comments, looks good ✅

Once a new release has been made, we just need to check to make sure there will be no major merge conflicts, and then we're good to go.

[Rylan12]

The way we've been using the multiple-license syntax is for when the user is given a choice for which license to use.

That's not the case here, because parts are under MIT and parts are under GPL-2.0. We should only specify the more restrictive license (which, I think, would be GPL-2.0)

[chenrui333]

Nice work.

[vladimyr]

Adding fd to the list. According to https://github.com/sharkdp/fd#license it should be marked as Apache-2.0 or MIT:

diff --git a/Formula/fd.rb b/Formula/fd.rb
index 22e33ce2d5..20fc11a74d 100644
--- a/Formula/fd.rb
+++ b/Formula/fd.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ class Fd < Formula
   homepage "https://github.com/sharkdp/fd"
   url "https://github.com/sharkdp/fd/archive/v8.1.1.tar.gz"
   sha256 "7b327dc4c2090b34c7fb3e5ac7147f7bbe6266c2d44b182038d36f3b1d347cc1"
-  license "Apache-2.0"
+  license ["Apache-2.0", "MIT"]
   head "https://github.com/sharkdp/fd.git"
 
   bottle do

[SeekingMeaning]

fd is distributed under the terms of both the MIT License and the Apache License 2.0.

MIT and Apache-2.0?

[vladimyr]

@SeekingMeaning Maybe I'm wrong but I parsed it as or: sharkdp/fd#105 (comment)

[SeekingMeaning]

Ah, I agree. Thank you for clarification

[dtrodrigues]

There's a couple more that I don't see in this PR:

rainbarf.rb
rust.rb
sheldon.rb
sql-translator.rb
transmission-cli.rb
ttf2eot.rb

[SeekingMeaning]

I'm not sure how to license ttf2eot since WebKit is licensed as party LGPL and partly BSD:

https://webkit.org/licensing-webkit/

WebKit is open source software with portions licensed under the LGPL and BSD licenses available here.

Would this be LGPL-2.0-or-later AND BSD-2-Clause? This would require Homebrew/brew#8260

[SeekingMeaning]

This needs to updated to the new Homebrew/brew#8260 syntax
(goffice, libfabric, and sheldon have already been updated)