Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LOS Multipath line of sight range is too far #820

Closed
BlackAlpha opened this issue Aug 30, 2019 · 8 comments
Closed

LOS Multipath line of sight range is too far #820

BlackAlpha opened this issue Aug 30, 2019 · 8 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@BlackAlpha
Copy link

Mods:

  • Arma 3: 1.94.145977 (Stable)
  • CBA: 3.12.1 (Steam)
  • ACRE2: v2.7.1.1016 (Steam)

Description:
AN/PRC-343 line of sight range is 2000-2500 meters with LOS Simple. The line of sight range is 5000+ meters with LOS Multipath. In both cases the Terrain Loss Coefficient is set to 1. I've managed to reproduce this various times in actual missions and a test mission (see below).

Steps to reproduce:

Expected behavior:
I believe the AN/PRC-343 line of sight range in real life is closer to 500-800 meters.

Where did the issue occur?
Dedicated

Log Files:

Additional context:
ACRE settings used:
Model Interference: On
Full Duplex Radios: Off
Ignore Antenna Direction: On
Automatic Antenna Direction: Off

@BlackAlpha BlackAlpha added the bug label Aug 30, 2019
@TheMagnetar
Copy link
Member

TheMagnetar commented Aug 30, 2019

Thanks for your detailed bug report. We will have a loot at it asap.

@arismagicgr
Copy link

I do have the same issue as @BlackAlpha although to be honest, I can not present all these info he did. I can just say that I have almost the same settings with the difference that I have "Ignore Antenna Direction: off". If there is a way to acquire all the info you need, please give me some guidance and I will do my best to follow.

@JamesTheClarke
Copy link

Our community utilises the same settings as @BlackAlpha with the exception of Model Interference and our results are more or less the same. As long as there is nothing breaking LOS the 353 range is very far indeed. Easy testing site is the Altis desert for example.

I agree with the OP that the 343 should be heavily distorted at around 800m even with LOS being maintained.

@TheMagnetar
Copy link
Member

At the moment (since 2.7.0) there are some subtle problems on how multipath is being calculated. LOS Simple and ITM should give more accurate results for the time being.

@JamesTheClarke
Copy link

@TheMagnetar we use LOS Simple because on Multipath we could barely create interference on the 343 net even in mountainous terrain.

With LOS Simple on flat (or slightly uneven) terrain, the transmission range of a 343 is between 2.2 and 2.5 clicks depending on the area. Hill areas tend to cut it down to 1000-1500m and mountains actually cut the 343 off entirely if they break LOS even within 200m (which is a good thing).

But flat and hilly terrain calculation needs some work as currently the 343s are very powerful indeed.

A temporary 343 "fix" is to switch to Arcade but there you run into the problem that 152 are too powerful making larger radios obsolete.

@jonpas jonpas added this to the 2.7.3 milestone Dec 17, 2019
@jonpas
Copy link
Member

jonpas commented Apr 15, 2020

Closed #827 as duplicate, because this issue is older and more to the point.

Also renamed to fit what the actual issue is.

@jonpas jonpas changed the title AN/PRC-343 line of sight range is too far LOS Multipath line of sight range is too far Apr 15, 2020
@jonpas
Copy link
Member

jonpas commented Apr 16, 2020

Just went to test older versions with @TyroneMF and confirmed it broke from 2.6.4 to 2.7.0.

@NouberNou
Copy link
Member

See fix in above PR.

TheMagnetar pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2020
…l model (#925)

* Use natural log when converting from volts to dBm.

* Small fixes/tweaks to signal map gen. to have it work again.
@jonpas jonpas closed this as completed Apr 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants