Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does the interface support torque? #28

Closed
sinamr88 opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Does the interface support torque? #28

sinamr88 opened this issue Jul 21, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@sinamr88
Copy link

Hi All,

I have a quick question. Does the interface support torque? The interface has a massage type dedicated to torque. Does it work? and another minor question, can we get the robot's mass matrix?

Thx a lot
Best
Sina

@Haas11
Copy link

Haas11 commented Jul 21, 2016

The java side has functionality to overlay either a joint torque or Cartesian force.
Not sure if already working through ROS. There's a branch dedicated to its development.

The dynamic model of the robot is hidden, both symbolically and numerically.

@sinamr88
Copy link
Author

Thx a lot for the reply

@SalvoVirga
Copy link
Member

Torque control "should" be available from KUKA via their Fast Robot Interface (FRI), I personally never tried it nor know anyone who did. In general the FRI interface is quite obscure and we don't feel the need to use it. In theory you should be able to have joint state monitoring and joint or torque control at 1kHz with it, but again, we never needed it and we have some doubts about it, so there is no ROS interface for it so far. Also, we use the Ethernet port that KUKA uses for FRI for other things, so at the moment the two things cannot live together.
In issue #7, @Haas11 recently showed that is possible to use a USB/Ethernet adapter on the cabinet instead of the KONI port. That might open the way to also integrate an interface to FRI.

About the robot's mass matrix, it is not publicly available, so nope.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants