You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
Is it important to save the name of the datacollector? From what I understand, the name is not relevant for the content of the text message and the Id of the datacollector should be enough to identify the datacollector later if needed. Thoughts?
The name is not needed as long as we have the Id, having it there will simply cause more work (with updating name etc). So feel free to drop it :)
About the new event, I think having a separate event is a good idea, but can we call it something else? Since we use TextMessageParsingFailed for the known data collectors, what about TextMessageParsingFailedAnonymous for example?
If an incoming SMS cannot be parsed as a single case report #44 or an aggregated case report #46:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: