Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REFACTOR(DB): Patient reference calculation moved to MySQL #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2016

Conversation

sfount
Copy link
Contributor

@sfount sfount commented Jan 7, 2016

Moves reference calculation from an additional controller transaction
step into a TRIGGER performed BEFORE a patient insert. This method of
calculating references delimited by project will allow any tables to
include this column without adding additional overhead in the codebase.

Moves reference calculation from an additional controller transaction
step into a TRIGGER performed BEFORE a patient insert. This method of
calculating references delimited by project will allow any tables to
include this column without adding additional overhead in the codebase.
@jniles jniles changed the title REFACTOR(Move reference calculation to data layer (MySQL)) REFACTOR(DB): Patient reference calculation moved to MySQL Jan 7, 2016
@jniles
Copy link
Collaborator

jniles commented Jan 7, 2016

LGTM.

jniles added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2016
REFACTOR(DB): Patient reference calculation moved to MySQL
@jniles jniles merged commit 0e78181 into IMA-WorldHealth:master Jan 7, 2016
@jniles jniles mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2016
1 task
@sfount sfount deleted the refactor-references branch March 29, 2016 12:31
sfount added a commit to sfount/bhima-2.X that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2016
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
jniles referenced this pull request in jniles/bhima Dec 24, 2016
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
jniles referenced this pull request in jniles/bhima Dec 27, 2016
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
sfount added a commit to sfount/bhima-2.X that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2016
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
sfount added a commit to sfount/bhima-2.X that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2016
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
jniles referenced this pull request in jniles/bhima Jan 3, 2017
This commit introduces the proposed barcode string standard for
receipt barcodes. This has been tested on the patient invoice receipt.
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2017
2320: Update pump to the latest version 🚀 r=jniles a=greenkeeper[bot]


## Version **2.0.0** of [pump](https://github.com/mafintosh/pump) was just published.

<table>
  <tr>
    <th align=left>
      Dependency
    </td>
    <td>
      pump
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th align=left>
      Current Version
    </td>
    <td>
      1.0.3
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <th align=left>
      Type
    </td>
    <td>
      devDependency
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

The version **2.0.0** is **not covered** by your **current version range**.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of pump.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


---


<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p>The new version differs by 2 commits.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/mafintosh/pump/commit/e3d0c444ceef59ff694c753303a35052e60b5186"><code>e3d0c44</code></a> <code>2.0.0</code></li>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/mafintosh/pump/commit/0c507239810b1e7f79ba0927ef78e90dd3a529e5"><code>0c50723</code></a> <code>(breaking) remove return of pipeline - closes #9 (#18)</code></li>
</ul>
<p>See the <a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/mafintosh/pump/compare/28557d8349d8e3b6878f9955d28b4a52c6a44de3...e3d0c444ceef59ff694c753303a35052e60b5186">full diff</a></p>
</details>

<details>
  <summary>FAQ and help</summary>

  There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html). If those don’t help, you can always [ask the humans behind Greenkeeper](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).
</details>


---


Your [Greenkeeper](https://greenkeeper.io) bot 🌴
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
3680: Update tempy to the latest version 🚀 r=jniles a=greenkeeper[bot]


## The dependency [tempy](https://github.com/sindresorhus/tempy) was updated from `0.2.1` to `0.3.0`.
This version is **not covered** by your **current version range**.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

---

<details>
<summary>Release Notes for v0.3.0</summary>

<p>Breaking:</p>
<ul>
<li>Require Node.js 8  <a class="commit-link" data-hovercard-type="commit" data-hovercard-url="https://github.com/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/a168b8dc4f050fe08a5266a06969564dc80e950c/hovercard" href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/a168b8dc4f050fe08a5266a06969564dc80e950c"><tt>a168b8d</tt></a></li>
</ul>
<p>Enhancements:</p>
<ul>
<li>Add TypeScript definition (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load issue title" data-id="432898666" data-permission-text="Issue title is private" data-url="sindresorhus/tempy#9" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/sindresorhus/tempy/pull/9/hovercard" href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/pull/9">#9</a>)  <a class="commit-link" data-hovercard-type="commit" data-hovercard-url="https://github.com/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/2e2760e02f5f4c7431f45740636b24f88bcbae2f/hovercard" href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/2e2760e02f5f4c7431f45740636b24f88bcbae2f"><tt>2e2760e</tt></a></li>
</ul>
<p><a class="commit-link" href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/compare/v0.2.1...v0.3.0"><tt>v0.2.1...v0.3.0</tt></a></p>
</details>

<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<p>The new version differs by 5 commits.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/8958de57554b06f1dceff8cd5f969aee57e0e056"><code>8958de5</code></a> <code>0.3.0</code></li>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/a168b8dc4f050fe08a5266a06969564dc80e950c"><code>a168b8d</code></a> <code>Require Node.js 8</code></li>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/2e2760e02f5f4c7431f45740636b24f88bcbae2f"><code>2e2760e</code></a> <code>Add TypeScript definition (#9)</code></li>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/ca90766551de5ba8e9d727ddf3d86ba0949f2e88"><code>ca90766</code></a> <code>Require Node.js 6</code></li>
<li><a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/commit/14edc260107351df453adad649e4cad0e2b5104f"><code>14edc26</code></a> <code>Minor code improvements and increased test coverage (#7)</code></li>
</ul>
<p>See the <a href="https://urls.greenkeeper.io/sindresorhus/tempy/compare/ec634c9e48a6feca53b70fcd0fbe80db5c5682b8...8958de57554b06f1dceff8cd5f969aee57e0e056">full diff</a></p>
</details>

<details>
  <summary>FAQ and help</summary>

  There is a collection of [frequently asked questions](https://greenkeeper.io/faq.html). If those don’t help, you can always [ask the humans behind Greenkeeper](https://github.com/greenkeeperio/greenkeeper/issues/new).
</details>

---


Your [Greenkeeper](https://greenkeeper.io) bot 🌴



Co-authored-by: greenkeeper[bot] <greenkeeper[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants