Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency pylint to v3.2.3 #476

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 6, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pylint (changelog) ==3.2.2 -> ==3.2.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

pylint-dev/pylint (pylint)

v3.2.3

Compare Source

False Positives Fixed

  • Classes with only an Ellipsis (...) in their body do not trigger 'multiple-statements'
    anymore if they are inlined (in accordance with black's 2024 style).

    Closes #​9398

  • Fix a false positive for redefined-outer-name when there is a name defined in an exception-handling block which shares the same name as a local variable that has been defined in a function body.

    Closes #​9671

  • Fix a false positive for use-yield-from when using the return value from the yield atom.

    Closes #​9696


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/pylint-3.x branch 2 times, most recently from d32d004 to 91b7c27 Compare June 20, 2024 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

0 participants