Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Unable to find find keyword in schema" #491

Closed
Stinkfist0 opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

"Unable to find find keyword in schema" #491

Stinkfist0 opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@Stinkfist0
Copy link
Contributor

Note the duplicate "find". While at it, it would be nice to report the actual keyword which was not recognized.

@aothms
Copy link
Member

aothms commented Oct 30, 2018

Ow oops. Thanks. Maybe if we're at it also create some different exception subclasses.

@Moult
Copy link
Contributor

Moult commented Jan 24, 2019

I looked at the code for this. Where can I find the "IFC4.exp" python file that generates Ifc4.cpp?

@Stinkfist0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Stinkfist0 commented Jan 25, 2019

These can be found from the buildingSMART website, however, I'm not completely sure which of these should be used now: http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/mvd/IFC4Add2TC1/

@aothms
Copy link
Member

aothms commented Jan 25, 2019

It's this one [0] since a couple days ago. There's a whole lotta schema versions that all have the same identifier IFC4, so it's good you asked. If only templates.py needs to be updated and if it's too much trouble I don't mind running the schema generation after merging the PR.

[0] http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/ifc/IFC4/Add2TC1/IFC4.exp

@aothms
Copy link
Member

aothms commented Feb 13, 2019

@Moult were you planning to commit a fix for this?

@Moult
Copy link
Contributor

Moult commented Sep 23, 2021

I guess this can be closed :)

@Moult Moult closed this as completed Sep 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants