Split up notebook check

[bharat-thotakura]

Interim test for #889

(Also re-runs some notebooks for updated target outputs and adds the available=True flag in _HPCA_Tutorial.ipynb)

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[bharat-thotakura]

Reminder: #752

[richrines1]

this lgtm! when you're ready to merge we can switch the github rules to the new set of checks

thanks for updating this :)

[bharat-thotakura]

this lgtm! when you're ready to merge we can switch the github rules to the new set of checks

thanks for updating this :)

Thanks! I'm good to merge this but also opened #893 as a brief solution (and also an attempt to begin the qss and css standardization moving forward) to drop the 'Notebook check for other docs' now rather than later -- if #893 looks good. Otherwise, we can keep the current update as is.

[bharat-thotakura]

Update: With #893 merged, this PR has been updated to only have the 'Notebook check for qiskit/cirq-superstaq'

cc: @vtomole @richrines1

[richrines1]

updated the requirements, so should be good to merge!

given that the checks still takes a while there might be an argument for splitting "supermarq" off into its own category down the line...

[bharat-thotakura]

^ I'm hoping the resolution to #772 would void the need for a further update since 'Notebook check for cirq-superstaq' finishes much faster and the cause seems to be the call to .backends()

[richrines1]

^ I'm hoping the resolution to #772 would void the need for a further update since 'Notebook check for cirq-superstaq' finishes much faster and the cause seems to be the call to .backends()

ahh yep that makes sense

[bharat-thotakura]

Made some interim changes with 1f953b0 that should hopefully cut down the qss notebook check time.