Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Sprint 93] ISY-650 (IF 2.x): Auslesen X-Correlation-ID Header #200

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024
Merged

[Sprint 93] ISY-650 (IF 2.x): Auslesen X-Correlation-ID Header #200

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

sb-sfink
Copy link
Contributor

  • feat: ISY-650 add @ConditionalOnMissingBean annotation to FilterRegistrationBean
  • chore: ISY-650 update changelog

@BerghoffP BerghoffP added the medium Issues/PRs with medium priority must be processed before operations with low label label Jan 8, 2024
huebnercl
huebnercl requested changes Jan 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@huebnercl huebnercl left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Abnahmekriterium:
2. Nutzungsvorgaben wie in A2 beschrieben umgesetzt
nicht erfüllt.

Es ist im Ticket wie im PR keine Info, ob A2 anderswo umgesetzt wurde.

@jsawatzk jsawatzk force-pushed the feature/ISY-650-IF2.x-Auslesen-X-Correlation-ID-Header branch from 3546154 to 661c71e Compare January 24, 2024 13:48
@sonarcloud SonarCloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@huebnercl huebnercl merged commit cae2c12 into release/2.x Jan 24, 2024
6 checks passed
@huebnercl huebnercl deleted the feature/ISY-650-IF2.x-Auslesen-X-Correlation-ID-Header branch January 24, 2024 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@huebnercl huebnercl huebnercl approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
medium Issues/PRs with medium priority must be processed before operations with low label
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@sb-sfink @huebnercl @BerghoffP @roman2906