Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update fork #7

Merged
merged 55 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020
Merged

Update fork #7

merged 55 commits into from
Oct 1, 2020

Conversation

JAnderson419
Copy link
Owner

Update

jhillairet and others added 30 commits July 3, 2020 14:42
add sorted in the read_all.
file input was nonsensical.
Probably happened due to transfer of files from Windows to Kubuntu.
Correct the nports according to proposal from @cloidnerux in issue #366
Correct nrows according to the proposal
jrmagers and others added 25 commits July 26, 2020 16:24
fixed error: plotted different mode gain instead of common mode gain
This fixes 

``
[...]/python3.8/site-packages/skrf/network.py:3039: SyntaxWarning: "is not" with a literal. Did you mean "!="?  
  if Pa.shape[0] is not 0:  
[...]/python3.8/site-packages/skrf/network.py:3385: SyntaxWarning: "is" with a literal. Did you mean "=="?  
  if common_freq[0].size is 0:  
``
Fix Python 3.8 SyntaxWarnings
…it and compared to ANSYS HFSS and Designer results.
Mention the 'traveling' option in the s_def option in the API
test again a simple transmission line
Voltages and currents calculation in Circuit
Don't shadow skrf's io module with the system io module.
While the mathematical result is different due to the different iFFT/FFT normalization, final result is the same as the kernel is normalized.
change ifft to fft in gate frequency domain calculation
@JAnderson419 JAnderson419 merged commit 2185d24 into JAnderson419:master Oct 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
7 participants