Fix for resizing cleanup entries dialog

[waterflow80]

Fixes #9223

Issue description

The content of the dialog for the cleanup entries becomes partially visible when resizing the
dialog (decreasing the size) vertically or horizontally.

Solution description

I added a ScrollPane and put the content of the presetPanel inside this ScrollPane in order to
be able to scroll and view the rest of the content when needed (when the dialog is resized).

Note: I put the name of the ScrollPane Object as scrollPane but I believe the name can be more significant and coherent
with the project structure.

I also changed the preferred height to 650, so when the dialog opens, it displays all the initial information without the need
to display the scroll bar.

The new CleanupDialog

Other possible enhancements

While fixing this issue, i noticed that the CleanupDialog can be resized with no limits. In other words the size of the dialog
can be reduced to 0 or extended to infinity, as show the pictures below:

So we can add min-width and min-height for the Dialog.

• Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)
• / Tests created for changes (if applicable)
• Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
• Screenshots added in PR description (for UI changes)
• Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
• Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.

[Siedlerchr]

Thanks for the PR. Please have a look at the failing test checkstyle or the reviewdog output.
Please also adjust the title of your PR so that it is directly clear what is about

[waterflow80]

Thanks for the PR. Please have a look at the failing test checkstyle or the reviewdog output. Please also adjust the title of your PR so that it is directly clear what is about

Hi @Siedlerchr, Thank you for you feedback,
I see that there is a failed check Cleanup after PR / cleanup (pull_request), and I don't really understand why it did that,
and whether it is required to pass in order to qualify for the merge.

And I am sure if I am concerned with the Deployment / Create installer and portable version for macOS (pull_request) check fail.

[Siedlerchr]

Hi,
You closed the PR so the action Cleanup after PR was triggered. But it cannot execute because it requires some secrets which are not avaiable in forks.
The same applies for mac os. It need some signing keys, however these are not avaiable on forks

[waterflow80]

Hi,
You closed the PR so the action Cleanup after PR was triggered. But it cannot execute because it requires some secrets which are not avaiable in forks.
The same applies for mac os. It need some signing keys, however these are not avaiable on forks

@Siedlerchr Yes I apologize because I mistakenly closed it (and eventually reopened it).
So I think that my PR is now ready for review?

[calixtus]

Changes look good so far to me, except one thought I would just like to discuss or think about.... Comments on this?

[Siedlerchr]

Thanks for your contribution! I think it's okay with the height then

[waterflow80]

Thanks for your contribution! I think it's okay with the height then

@Siedlerchr It was a pleasure for me. Thanks.