Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
Given a prediction (p) and a label (y), a loss function measures the discrepancy between the algorithm's prediction and the desired output. VW currently supports the following loss functions, with squared loss being the default:
Expected return on stock
What is a typical price for a house?
Probability of click on ad
Is the digit a 7?
|Poisson||Counts (Log Mean)||Regression
Number of call events to call center
|Classic||Squared loss without
importance weight aware updates
squared loss often performs better than classic.
To select a loss function in VW see the Command line arguments guide. The Logistic and Hinge loss are for binary classification only, and thus all samples must have class "-1" or "1". More information on loss function semantics in these slides (pdf) from an online learning course.
The Python wrapper overrides the default squared loss with logistic loss when using VWClassifier.
Which loss function should I use?
- If the problem is a binary classification (i.e. labels are -1 and +1) your choices should be Logistic or Hinge loss (although Squared loss may work as well). If you want VW to report the 0-1 loss instead of the logistic/hinge loss, add
--binary. Example: spam vs non-spam, odds of click vs no-click.
- For binary classification where you need to know the posterior probabilities, use
--loss_function logistic --link logistic.
- If the problem is a regression problem, meaning the target label you're trying to predict is a real value -- you should be using Squared or Quantile loss. Example: revenue, height, weight. If you're trying to minimize the mean error, use squared-loss. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_squares . If OTOH you're trying to predict rank/order and you don't mind the mean error to increase as long as you get the relative order correct, you need to minimize the error vs the median (or any other quantile), in this case, you should use quantile-loss. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantile_regression