Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove doc saying timelock utxo can be spent in cj #964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2021

Conversation

chris-belcher
Copy link
Contributor

Only guaranteed way to spend is non-coinjoin. Perhaps coinjoin on taker side
will work one day, if so then the doc can be edited again.

Related to #955 and #957

Only guaranteed way to spend is non-coinjoin. Perhaps coinjoin on taker side
will work one day, if so then the doc can be edited again.
Copy link
Member

@kristapsk kristapsk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 13ae0c3

@AdamISZ
Copy link
Member

AdamISZ commented Aug 4, 2021

Agreed (small side note: it doesn't with payjoin either because we can't construct half-signed PSBTs with these utxos either, see #958 ; note that this agrees with this language because it says non-coinjoin).

Merging.

@AdamISZ AdamISZ merged commit 004a4be into master Aug 4, 2021
@chris-belcher chris-belcher deleted the clarify-fidelity-bond-spending branch August 4, 2021 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants