Pull request/19845a6e

[fairbrot]

No description provided.

[IainNZ]

Hi @fairbrot,
Looks like a neat package. Two things:

• The name. There is a preference to err on the side of clarity, so GaussianProcesses.jl would be a really great choice for a name.
• Tagging. You actually need to tag a version to be able to Pkg.add a package. This can be done after registration or at the same time.

[kmsquire]

Is this meant to be the canonical Gaussian Process package? If not necessarily, then it might not be good to take that name.

[kmsquire]

It might also be fine. There are many possible ways to implement decision trees, and one of them happens to be implemented in the DecisionTrees.jl package.

[ViralBShah]

I think the generic name is ok here.

[ViralBShah]

I mean GaussianProcesses is ok.

[johnmyleswhite]

I think names like GaussianProcesses are fine if we develop some community standards that reflect who owns what. If we allow some kind of eminent domain rulings on names like DataFrames or Stats, then the names are safe to use.

[fairbrot]

Hi everyone, thanks for the feedback. We're happy to change the name of the package to GaussianProcesses. We'll update this over the next few days,

[fairbrot]

Pull request has been recreated at #2561