Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Put back getfield :boundscheck hack #48677

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2023
Merged

Put back getfield :boundscheck hack #48677

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2023

Conversation

Keno
Copy link
Member

@Keno Keno commented Feb 14, 2023

We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of

@inbounds (1,2)[1]

With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness, overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.
@vchuravy vchuravy added the backport 1.9 Change should be backported to release-1.9 label Feb 14, 2023
@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 113c2f3 into master Feb 15, 2023
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the kf/bcheckhack branch February 15, 2023 00:51
@KristofferC KristofferC mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2023
50 tasks
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

(cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

(cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

(cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

(cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2023
We used to have this hack before #48246, but I removed it because I had
hoped we don't need. Unfortunately, we weren't able to infer consistency of
```
@inbounds (1,2)[1]
```
With this hack, constprop is able to independently prove inbounded-ness,
overriding the usual consistency taintaing that happens for inbounds.

(cherry picked from commit 113c2f3)
@KristofferC KristofferC removed the backport 1.9 Change should be backported to release-1.9 label Mar 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants