Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Support Hessenberg matrices #7965

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

WIP: Support Hessenberg matrices #7965

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jiahao
Copy link
Member

@jiahao jiahao commented Aug 11, 2014

This is a woefully incomplete stub toward supporting Hessenberg matrices (upper/lower triangular matrices with an extra nonzero sub/super-diagonal) in Julia.

Currently the only thing implemented is a LAPACK.hsein wrapper, which needs to be tested.

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

Maybe we wan't to think of the Hessenberg matrix type together with a SymTridiagonalFactorization type (or maybe even a Factorization{SymTridiagonal}). Right now we have a Hessenberg factorization and a SymTridiagonal matrix type.

@jiahao
Copy link
Member Author

jiahao commented Aug 12, 2014

Yes, I think we'll want both.

Ref: #6434

@vtjnash
Copy link
Sponsor Member

vtjnash commented Jun 26, 2019

Current status of this PR seems to be given by #6434 (comment):

tkelman commented on Aug 11, 2015

Not really, the current Hessenberg is a QR-related factorization type. #7965 implements a little more of the lapack bindings for a Hessenberg matrix type, but is about a year out of date.

edit: amazingly there's apparently no conflict there, but it needs tests and updating for #8734 and probably a few other changes.

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Member

This is from before the migration to standard libraries to it can't really be rebased so it would be easier to start over.

@DilumAluthge DilumAluthge deleted the cjh/hess branch March 25, 2021 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants