Update for BoundaryValueDiffEq v5

[mateuszbaran]

This may resolve the never-ending solving problem on BoundaryValueDiffEq v5. Resolves #664 . Replaces #657 .

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #672 (58c9681) into master (cdf3f6c) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #672   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.40%   99.40%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines       10599    10600    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        10536    10537    +1     
  Misses         63       63           

Files	Coverage Δ
ext/ManifoldsBoundaryValueDiffEqExt.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[kellertuer]

This even looks like a relatively easy fix in the end – are we sure the new tests run on v5? And then maybe check why we currently loose a bit of coverage.

But for the rest (besides of course a short note in the news) this looks nice!

[mateuszbaran]

This even looks like a relatively easy fix in the end – are we sure the new tests run on v5? And then maybe check why we currently loose a bit of coverage.

Yes, Julia v1.9 tests run on BoundaryValueDiffEq v5 while Julia v1.6 tests run on BoundaryValueDiffEq v4. I just don't feel particularly good about tests running more than an hour 😞 .

Coverage loss looks like false positives.