Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase upper bound of some StatsBase dependencies to 0.30 #227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

nalimilan
Copy link
Contributor

These are dependencies for which tests passed with StatsBase 0.30.0 under Julia 1.1. Some false negatives might still need manual fixing.

These are dependencies for which tests passed with StatsBase 0.30.0
under Julia 1.1. Some false negatives might still need manual fixing.
Copy link
Contributor

@StefanKarpinski StefanKarpinski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. @fredrikekre, @KristofferC do you want to look it over for sanity? If either of you thinks it looks ok, just merge.

@KristofferC KristofferC merged commit ad0a20e into JuliaRegistries:master Apr 23, 2019
@nalimilan nalimilan deleted the nl/StatsBase branch April 23, 2019 15:40
@nalimilan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks. It would be great to automate this. :-)

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

You could also stop releasing non-breaking breaking releases of StatsBase! 😄

@nalimilan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, we're going to try moving things to Statistics or other packages. But in general, major releases will continue to happen, and (hopefully) they won't always break all packages.

@nalimilan
Copy link
Contributor Author

For reference, here's the list of packages that failed tests. Still quite a lot of porting to do (probably most of these failures are spurious).
["AbbrvKW", "ActiveAppearanceModels", "ApproxBayes", "Augur", "AverageShiftedHistograms", "ApproximateBayesianComputing", "ARCHModels", "Agents", "BayesNets", "Boltzmann", "Brim", "Brownian", "BooSTjl", "BeliefUpdaters", "ChaosCommunications", "CombineML", "CoupledFields", "Crispulator", "CrossDecomposition", "CrossMappings", "ChemometricsTools", "DSGE", "DataArrays", "DataTables", "DirectGaussianSimulation", "DPMeansClustering", "DynamicHMCModels", "EcologicalNetwork", "EventHistory", "ForecastEval", "GLM", "GaussianMixtures", "GeoStats", "GeoStatsDevTools", "Gillespie", "Graph500", "GraphCentrality", "GraphGLRM", "HurdleDMR", "ImageQuilting", "ImageView", "IncrementalInference", "InverseDistanceWeighting", "InvariantCausal", "InteractiveChaos", "JointMoments", "Klara", "Kpax3", "LocallyWeightedRegression", "Lora", "LowRankModels", "LyapunovExponents", "MachineLearning", "Mads", "MarketTechnicals", "Microbiome", "Mimi", "MixedModels", "MultipleTesting", "MCMCChain", "MRIReco", "MambaModels", "MCMCChains", "MonteCarloMeasurements", "NHST", "NLreg", "NMF", "NetalignMeasures", "NetalignUtils", "NullableArrays", "NextGenSeqUtils", "Orchestra", "PGFPlots", "PGFPlotsX", "ParticleFilters", "PowerLaws", "PiecewiseDeterministicMarkovProcesses", "RandomQuantum", "RegERMs", "RegressionTables", "Rifraf", "RobustLeastSquares", "RobustStats", "ReinforcementLearning", "SALSA", "SOM", "ScikitLearn", "Shannon", "SortingLab", "SpatialEcology", "Spectra", "StackedNets", "StatPlots", "Stats", "StreamStats", "StatisticalRethinking", "StatsKit", "StatsMakie", "StatsPlots", "StanModels", "SpectralGaussianSimulation", "StratiGraphics", "TensorDecompositions", "TimeModels", "TimeseriesSurrogates","TuringModels", "TSML", "Variography", "Vega", "Wallace", "Whippet", "Winston", "YaoArrayRegister"]

@StefanKarpinski
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sorry about the transition pains. We'll get these things sorted out soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants