Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential support for CRAM input #26

Open
HudoGriz opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Potential support for CRAM input #26

HudoGriz opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@HudoGriz
Copy link

Hello ClinSV team!

Great software, we include it regular in our new workflows!
We would like to re-analyse old data, but the alignments are compressed in CRAM files. We are sure that there are more labs which keep the data as CRAM (less space than BAM), so we suggest including CRAM files as optional input files.

Keep up the great work!

Blaž Vrhovšek

@melnel000
Copy link

Thanks ClinSV for sharing this pipeline. I am about to try it out but I also need to uncompress my CRAM files to BAM so CRAM support would be a great feature.

@drmjc
Copy link
Member

drmjc commented Jun 10, 2022

Hi, thanks for the great feedback.
Adding seamless support for different ref genomes is at the top of the list, but I agree this will be a useful feature to add

@HudoGriz
Copy link
Author

@melnel000 out of curiosity, did you manage to run the analysis on converted files?
For me CNVnator fails on converted BAM files. The conversion was done using Samtools: samtools view -b -T <refgenome.fa> -o <file.bam> <file.cram>.

@melnel000
Copy link

@HudoGriz yes, I could run on the bam files without issues and some of these were converted using samtools.

@cluhaowie
Copy link

Hi, all I just have the same suggestion with the cram file and see people have already posted it earlier. Wonder if it's any update?

@drmjc
Copy link
Member

drmjc commented Feb 9, 2023 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants