Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
In §1.3.1, we have the following wording:
This is confusing, because §1.3.1 is all about the Protection API and the 'Protect a Resource' flow, but the note is about RPT/AAT flow. If you are reading the spec from top-to-bottom, with no particular foreknowledge of the spec, then the potential relevance of the RPT is entirely unclear.
Suggest the following alternative wording (edits in bold):
In UMA ad hoc telecon 2015-09-08 (which had quorum), this was the discussion and conclusion:
"Andi’s new issue suggests seating the “presumptively protected resource” note more firmly into the Sec 1.3.1 context. Eve likes it so much that she suggests doing this with each of the instances.
Okay, let’s give her an editorial instruction to do so."