-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 284
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #35503 - Notify user only when new errata are added to repo #10328
Merged
ianballou
merged 1 commit into
Katello:master
from
wbclark:35503_new_repository_errata_only
Nov 1, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the
.reverse
(dtto forrun
)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I previously tried a format where the truncated input remains an Array containing the first few IDs, appended with the truncation message. The reversed order made sense because the ordering of the erratum ids corresponds to the order which the erratum records were created, so with a partially truncated output it means we see the most recently created (which in most cases would be the most recently associated) at the top, which provides a "good intuition" for the cutoff between new vs. prior associated errata.
I then leaned towards just replacing the entire Array with a string containing the count, if the length is greater than some number, reasoning that it's simpler for the user to read (the data types were mixed within the Array in the previous way, so the user would see several integers followed by an ugly double-quoted string) and maybe easier to maintain.
But I chose the Array length for truncation to kick in very arbitrarily as 3, and I'm not sure if there is some better value. In particular if we allow the user to see a larger Array then I think the reverse ordering feels more intuitive. Since Array reversal should be cheap (linear complexity) I just left it in.
What do you think about it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see, then it makes sense to me.